
In 2015, The Hunting Ground put campus sexual assault on the national stage. We look at what the research says, why so many students never report, and what happened when two UNC students challenged their university. This is a two-part series, and it sets up our Cornell case.
November 10, 2026
Content note: this post and the episodes discuss sexual assault and how institutions respond to it. We keep the details out of this page, but the topic is heavy.
The Hunting Ground is a 2015 documentary that brought national attention to sexual assault on college campuses. Even more than that, it focused on what happened when students tried to report.
We are not here to recap a documentary scene by scene. We started with three bigger questions. How common is sexual assault on college campuses? Why do so many students never report it? And when someone does come forward, can they trust the institution that is responsible for investigating?
The deeper we got, the more those questions turned into one. The same school is asked to protect students, investigate serious allegations, and protect its own reputation, and maybe its fundraising too, all at once. What happens when those jobs pull in different directions?
“Rape is like a football game, and if you look back on the game, what would you do differently in that situation?”
According to Annie Clark, that is what a university administrator said to her when she went looking for help.
She had expected resources. She had expected support. Instead, she says, she was asked what she could have done differently.
That moment is where this two-part series starts. It is not really a story about one night or one school. It is a story about what happens when a student asks an institution for help, and the institution is also the one deciding how the story gets told.
Before they were advocates, they were students who loved their school.
Annie grew up outside Raleigh, did well academically and athletically, and arrived at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill excited about college. She was not showing up expecting to become an activist or an adversary of the university.
Andrea was a high-achieving student from Miami and the first in her family to leave Florida for college. UNC was her dream school. That matters, because the decision to challenge UNC was not the story of someone who never trusted the place.
Both women have described experiences of sexual violence in their own words. Those are their accounts, and we treat them that way. What we want you to notice is what each of them needed afterward. Annie wanted help and information. Andrea did not know how to report something she could not fully reconstruct. Neither started by asking, “How do I win a case?”
Then Andrea reached out to Annie, and two individual experiences turned into a shared effort to find out what UNC was doing when students asked for help.
Annie did not initially want to call what happened to her by that name. Researchers have studied that for decades, and part of the answer is what people expect it to look like. We tend to picture a stranger, physical violence, an instant realization, and a call to the police.
That is not what many assaults look like. Bureau of Justice Statistics research on women ages 18 to 24 found that roughly 80% of incidents involved someone the victim knew. Knowing the person can make it harder to name what happened. None of the details people often use to doubt a story, like knowing him, being at the party, or drinking, decides whether an assault occurred.
The same research found that about 80% of rape and sexual assault incidents involving female college students were not reported to police. Think about what that does to the numbers a school or a police department collects. If an incident never gets reported, it may never show up in the official count. That does not mean it did not happen.
It also brings us back to Annie. Her friend wanted to report and did not know how. Annie did not know either. Two college students had to Google their own university’s process.
This is a number people throw around, so it is worth slowing down.
In 2019, the Association of American Universities surveyed students at 33 universities, and more than 181,000 students responded. About 25.9% of undergraduate women reported nonconsensual sexual contact involving physical force or inability to consent since enrolling. That is roughly one in four.
But it includes both penetration and unwanted sexual touching. It does not mean one in four women reported being raped. About 22% of invited students took part, and the schools were mostly large research universities, so it is not a precise national rate for every campus.
Another federal study found rates ranging from about 4% to 20% among undergraduate women across nine colleges in a single year. There is no one universal number. Experiencing misconduct, recognizing it, reporting it to the school, and reporting it to police are four different things.
The Hunting Ground puts a lot of emphasis on fraternity culture, and researchers have tried to untangle it. One question is whether fraternities attract certain behaviors or encourage them. Researchers call that selection versus socialization.
A 2021 study followed 772 male college students, including 116 fraternity members, through their first two years. It found evidence for both. Students who drank heavily and held more permissive attitudes toward casual sex before college were more likely to join. Membership was also linked to increases in binge drinking and to higher reports of sexually aggressive behavior afterward. It was an observational study at one university, so it cannot say that joining a fraternity causes any specific person to commit assault.
Another body of research points to peer approval. What people believe their friends will excuse or laugh off can shape their own behavior. The film shows a Brown University scene where students react dismissively to a list of names written in a campus bathroom. We do not know the truth of that list, and we are not treating names on it as findings. What stood out to us was the attitude, and why students felt they had to warn each other outside the official system at all.
Alcohol shows up in the research and the film too. It can affect someone’s ability to recognize danger or give consent. It does not excuse sexual violence.
Andrea did not start with a federal complaint. She started by trying to make the problem visible. She describes launching the Courage Project, a photo project inviting students to identify publicly as survivors, and says nine students came forward to her within four weeks. She also says her meetings with university leaders were delayed or dismissed. Those are her descriptions of the response.
A former UNC assistant dean of students, Melinda Manning, publicly alleged in January 2013 that she had been pressured to underreport sexual assaults in federally required campus crime data. UNC denied it.
That connects to the Clery Act, which requires schools to disclose certain crimes reported on campus. A low reported number can mean fewer incidents, fewer reports, different classification practices, or some mix. The same institution publishes numbers that shape how safe it looks to prospective students and parents, and it is also supposed to encourage reporting. Those incentives can pull in different directions without anyone assuming bad intent in a particular case.
In January 2013, Annie and Andrea filed a federal complaint alongside another student, Landen Gambill, and Melinda Manning. They alleged UNC had failed to provide adequate procedures and responses to reports of sexual harassment and violence, and raised the question of whether the school was accurately reporting campus sex offenses.
Those were allegations, not findings. By their own account, they taught themselves Title IX and spent long hours on the complaint, even sleeping in shifts. In March 2013, the U.S. Department of Education opened an investigation. That did not mean investigators agreed with the students. It meant UNC would have to answer questions.
The university pushed back on the underreporting claim, and another student who had spoken publicly faced a campus disciplinary charge of her own. An investigation is not the same as accountability, and it is certainly not the same as closure.
Part 1, “Does It Count?” releases Tuesday, November 10, 2026. We look at what the research tells us about prevalence, reporting, and campus culture, and we meet Annie and Andrea.
Part 2, “Five Different Answers,” releases Thursday, November 12, 2026. We follow what happens when police, prosecutors, universities, and courts examine allegations, and we return to UNC to see how the federal government answered the complaint we leave you with in Part 1. Patreon members can listen to Part 2 early.
Every case in this series comes back to one question: when a student reports sexual assault, whose future is the institution most concerned about protecting?
A student who reports deserves to be heard, supported, and taken seriously. A student who is accused deserves a fair, impartial process and a real chance to answer the evidence. Neither goal cancels out the other. And a school’s job cannot be to manage its image first and sort out the students afterward.
That is also why we are starting here. On November 17, 2026 we are digging into The Cornell 7 case, an ongoing and disputed legal matter. Before we can talk about how one school handled one set of allegations, we need to understand the system those allegations sit inside.
Listen on Spotify or watch on YouTube. You can also find us on Apple Podcasts. Tell us what you think, and tell us what case we should cover next.
It is a 2015 documentary by Kirby Dick about sexual assault on college campuses and how universities respond. It follows students at several schools, including Annie Clark and Andrea Pino at UNC.
They are former UNC students who challenged the university over its handling of sexual assault complaints and later helped build the organization End Rape on Campus.
No. The 2019 AAU survey figure covers nonconsensual sexual contact involving physical force or inability to consent, including penetration and unwanted touching. It is not a count of rapes alone.
Researchers point to not recognizing the experience as assault, not wanting to be seen as a victim, fear of not being believed, worry about how others will react, and not knowing what reporting involves.
It is a federal law requiring colleges to disclose certain crimes reported on campus and to issue timely warnings about qualifying threats. It is not a census of every assault students experience.
Title IX is a federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in schools that receive federal funding, including certain forms of sexual harassment and violence.
No. The research looks at risk factors and group norms. It does not say every fraternity or every member contributes to sexual violence.
The Cornell 7 case involves disputed allegations, and understanding how institutions investigate these cases gives helpful context. The allegations in that case have not been established as fact.
Part 1 releases Tuesday, November 10, 2026, and Part 2 releases Thursday, November 12, 2026.
On Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts, and you can watch on YouTube.